Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

S.E.S v. Galena Unified School District No. 499

United States District Court, D. Kansas

July 12, 2018

S.E.S., as Next Friend and Mother of J.M.S., a Minor, Plaintiff,


          Daniel D. Crabtree Unites States District Judge

         This matter comes before the court on plaintiff's Motion for Leave To File Complaint and Proceed Using Initials (Doc. 6) filed January 24, 2018. Plaintiff, as next friend and mother of J.M.S., seeks leave to proceed in this case with herself and family members-her husband and her minor sons[1]-identified only by their initials. For the reasons explained below, the court grants plaintiff's motion.

         Factual Background

         The following facts come from plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1). Plaintiff alleges that, while he was a student at Galena Middle School from 2014 to 2017, J.M.S. endured sex and gender discrimination in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. The alleged harassment began in response to J.M.S.'s gender or refusal to conform to stereotypical male characteristics at Galena Middle School. The perpetrators were schoolmates under the disciplinary authority of U.S.D. No. 499.

         The Complaint alleges verbal harassment, physical threats, and physical contact. Due to his diagnosis of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (“ITP”)-a bleeding disorder in which the immune system destroys platelets-J.M.S. asserts he has greater risk of physical harm. Also, he asserts, students and teachers knew about his diagnosis and enhanced risk to harm. The plaintiff saw that her son was subjected to the harassment and physical conduct. Plaintiff claims she repeatedly reported the behavior to U.S.D. No. 499 employees but they did nothing to alleviate it.

         The Complaint contends the harassment was “so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively deprived [J.M.S.] of access to educational benefits or opportunities provided by the school district.” Doc. 1 at 20 (Compl. ¶ 73). Both J.M.S. and G.L.S. (his younger brother) have enrolled at school in Joplin for the 2017-2018 school year to avoid instances of “bullying, harassing, and gay-bashing” at Galena Middle School. Doc. 1 at 20-21 (Compl. ¶ 71-72). The incidents allegedly have caused actual damages in the form of extreme embarrassment, humiliation, anxiety, depression, and emotional pain. J.M.S. has been diagnosed as the victim of psychological abuse causing adjustment disorder with anxiety. J.M.S. has sought treatment from neuropsychologists and continues to participate in individual psychotherapy.

         Legal Analysis

         I. Legal Standard

         J.M.S. and his brother, G.L.S., are minors, and thus, appropriately identified by initials. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2(a)(3). Allowing an adult party to proceed under a pseudonym in federal court is, by all accounts, an unusual procedure. Doe v. USD No. 237 Smith Ctr. Sch. Dist., No. 16-CV-2801-JWL-TJJ, 2017 WL 3839416, at *10 (D. Kan. Sept. 1, 2017). Courts recognize a general right for the public to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents. Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978). The court should exercise “informed discretion” and weigh the interests of the public, which are presumptively paramount, against those advanced by parties. Crystal Grower's Corp. v. Dobbins, 616 F.2d 458, 461 (10th Cir. 1980). When a court grants a party permission to proceed under a pseudonym, it often couples that permission with the requirement that the party disclose its real name to the defendant and the court. W.N.J. v. Yocom, 257 F.3d 1171, 1172 (10th Cir. 2001).

         There are, however, narrowly defined permissible exceptions to this rule. They exist when the requesting party demonstrates that the need for anonymity outweighs the presumption in favor of open court proceedings. Exceptional circumstances exist if the case involves: (1) matters of a highly sensitive and personal nature, (2) real danger of physical harm, or (3) where the disclosure would cause the party to sustain the injury that the litigation seeks to avert. Raiser v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 182 Fed.Appx. 810, 811 (10th Cir. 2006).

         II. Discussion

         The court evaluates the current claim of exceptional circumstances by examining to the factors enumerated in Raiser.

         First, this case presents a highly sensitive and personal issue. The Complaint seeks damages for sex and gender discrimination against a minor in violation of Title IX. Courts grant heightened protection to child victims and have concluded that complaints involving minors are matters of a highly sensitive and personal nature. See U.S.D. No. 237, 2017 WL 3839416, at *11; see also J.B. v. Liberal Sch. Dist., USD No. 480, No. 06-2359-MLB, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67622, at *5 (D. Kan. Sept. 20, 2006).

         Here, J.M.S.'s parents exceed the age of majority, and thus, have more limited privacy interests. Doe v. Cabrera, 307 F.R.D. 1, 6 (D.D.C. 2014). However, J.M.S. and his parents share common privacy interests based on their inseparable relationship to one another. J.W. v. District of Columbia, 318 F.R.D. 196, 201 (D.D.C. 2016). Ordering disclosure of the parent's identities would place-in effect-personally identifiable and confidential information about the alleged sex and gender harassment of a minor in the public record. Disclosing the parent's identities would affect J.M.S. the most. The request by ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.