Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilson v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, D. Kansas

May 21, 2018

CONNIE WILSON, Plaintiff,
v.
TRANS UNION, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendants.

          PLAINTIFF Anthony M. Hernandez Creighton P. Mayo Credit Law Center.

          EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Patrick J. Beisell Danne W. Webb.

          NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC Barbara L. Albert Akerman, LLP.

          EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC Guillermo Gabriel Zorogastua Polsinelli P.C.

          TRANS UNION, LLC Bryan E. Mouber James S. Kreamer Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice, LLC.

          AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER

          James P. O'Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge.

         The parties agree that during the course of discovery it may be necessary to disclose certain confidential information relating to the subject matter of this action. They agree that certain categories of such information should be treated as confidential, protected from disclosure outside this litigation, and used only for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action and any appeals. The parties jointly request entry of this proposed Protective Order to limit the disclosure, dissemination, and use of certain identified categories of confidential information.

         The parties assert in support of their request that protection of the identified categories of confidential information is necessary because such documents and information will contain, inter alia, personal financial information, trade secrets, and other sensitive business information not publicly disseminated.

         For good cause shown under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), the court grants the parties' joint request and hereby enters the following Protective Order:

         1. Scope. All documents and materials produced in the course of discovery of this case, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), are subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as set forth below. As there is a presumption in favor of open and public judicial proceedings in the federal courts, this Order will be strictly construed in favor of public disclosure and open proceedings wherever possible.

         2. Definition of Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential Information” is defined as information that the producing party designates in good faith has been previously maintained in a confidential manner and should be protected from disclosure and use outside the litigation because its disclosure and use is restricted by statute or could potentially cause harm to the interests of disclosing party or nonparties. For purposes of this Order, the parties will limit their designation of “Confidential Information” to the following categories of information or documents:

Financial statements and records, personal information concerning consumers not involved in this litigation, proprietary business records, trade secrets, records whose disclosure is restricted or prohibited by statute, and any other confidential information the public disclosure of which would harm a party or third party.

         Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as Confidential Information.

         3. Form and Timing of Designation. The producing party may designate documents as containing Confidential Information and therefore subject to protection under this Order by marking or placing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” or the like (hereinafter “the marking”) on the document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions that contain the Confidential Information. The marking will be applied prior to or at the time the documents are produced or disclosed. Applying the marking to a document does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. Copies that are made of any designated documents must also bear the marking, except that indices, electronic databases, or lists of documents that do not contain substantial portions or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the substance of the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. By marking a designated document as confidential, the designating attorney or party appearing pro se thereby certifies that the document contains Confidential Information as defined in this Order.

         4. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. Inadvertent failure to designate any document or material as containing Confidential Information will not constitute a waiver of an otherwise valid claim of confidentiality pursuant to this Order, so long as a claim of confidentiality is asserted within seven (7) business days after discovery of the inadvertent failure.

         5. Depositions. For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings, that the designating party may identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing or other proceeding, all protected testimony that contains confidential information, to be designated as Confidential Information; portions of the testimony so designated under this method shall be marked by the court reporter in any transcript thereafter delivered. A party may also, if it wishes, invoke on the record a right to have up to 30 days from receipt of the deposition transcript to designate specific portions of the testimony as Confidential Information. Any testimony designated as Confidential Information under either or both of the two methods identified above shall thereafter be treated as such in accordance with this order.

         6. Protection of Confidential Material.

(a) General Protections. Designated Confidential Information must be used or disclosed solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this lawsuit, ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.