Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hunter v. Douglas County District Court

United States District Court, D. Kansas

April 16, 2014

CHARLES CURTIS HUNTER, Petitioner,
v.
DOUGLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge.

This action was initiated when Mr. Hunter, a state inmate confined at the Larned State Hospital (LSH), submitted a document entitled "Motion for Evidentiary Hearing" (Doc. 1) and other motions. The court briefly reviewed the filings before docketing, and directed the clerk to file this motion as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for several reasons.[1] Having considered all the materials submitted by petitioner, the court finds that the petition is deficient in several ways. Mr. Hunter is given time to cure these deficiencies. If he fails to do so within the time prescribed by the court, this action may be dismissed without further notice.

FILING FEE

The statutory fee for filing a habeas corpus petition is $5.00. Mr. Hunter has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 3) with a "Resident Trust Fund" sheet attached (Doc. 3-1), and an "Affidavit of Financial Status" (Doc. 4) that provides no additional information.[2] Although it is not clear that the "Resident Trust Fund" statement, which is not certified, or the other two filings comply with the requirements in 28 U.S.C. § 1915, [3] the court grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis based upon petitioner's affidavit and record showing that he has insufficient funds to pay the filing fee at this time. In doing so, the court accepts as true petitioner's allegation that the "Balance" shown on his account record is "Mandatory Savings." This grant is subject to change should significantly different financial information come to the court's attention.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Mr. Hunter does not provide a detailed factual background for this action. The court has gleaned some background information from the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC) website (KASPER) that contains information on all KDOC offenders as well as the opinion of the state court in State v. Hunter, 41 Kan.App.2d 507, 203 P.3d 23 (Kan.App. 2009). In addition, the court takes judicial notice of the several prior habeas corpus actions filed by Mr. Hunter in this court: Hunter v. Kansas, Case No. 92-cv-3136-DES (D.Kan. Apr. 10, 1992)(dismissed without prejudice for failure to state claim); Hunter v. State of Kansas, Case No. 92-cv-3181-DES (D.Kan. May 20, 1992)(dismissed as repetitive of prior case); Hunter v. Kansas, Case No. 92-cv-3280-DES (D.Kan. Aug. 3, 1992)(dismissed as repetitive of two prior cases); Hunter v. State of Kansas, Case No. 94-cv-3497-DES[4] (D.Kan. July 19, 1995)(petition denied); Hunter v. Douglas County, Case No. 95-3261-SAC (D.Kan. July 19, 1995).

In 1982, Mr. Hunter was tried and convicted in Douglas County District Court Case No. CR7924 of four counts of rape, two counts of attempted rape, and 7 counts of aggravated burglary. He has been "confined in various correctional facilities" since these offenses were committed in 1978. State v. Hunter, 203 P.3d at 25. In his initial pleading, Mr. Hunter alleges that the court set aside his sentence and ordered him committed to the Larned State Security Hospital "for care and treatment in leu (sic) of imprisonment" but four years later he was "cast into prison." He also alleges that he has been receiving treatment for severe mental illness since 1979 when he was 16 years old, and that this is his tenth admission to LSH.

In 2005 while Mr. Hunter was incarcerated at the Larned State Correctional Facility he was charged with battery of a law enforcement officer as the result of an incident during which he hit a Corrections Officer between the eyes and several times on the head with the metal end of his belt and tried to kick the officer in the head after the officer fell. State v. Hunter, 203 P.3d at 25-26. The trial court in that case ordered an "evaluation of competency and mental examination" under Kansas statutes, and following the evaluation found that Hunter was "competent to stand trial." Id. at 26. Mr. Hunter's "defense at trial was that he suffered from a mental disease or defect that rendered him incapable to form the requisite intent to commit the crime." Id. Mr. Hunter and several mental health professionals testified at his trial. The jury found Hunter guilty of the offense, and he was sentenced in 2007 "to a prison term of 130 months, which was to run consecutive to the prison sentence he was currently serving." Id. at 28. The court ordered Hunter "committed to the Larned State Security Hospital for psychiatric care, treatment, and maintenance under K.S.A. 22-3430." Id. According to KDOC offender records, Mr. Hunter's "active sentences" are those from 1982 (CR7924) and 2005 (Pawnee County Case No. 05CR120).

GROUNDS

Mr. Hunter initially sets forth two grounds for relief in his motion/petition. First, he claims that his court-appointed counsel in state criminal proceedings was ineffective for failing to "put in" a mental defense or for failing to have him plead not guilty by reason of insanity. In support, he alleges that the doctors at LSH diagnosed him with psychosis and mental and emotional disorders. He attaches a medication order form listing his medications for psychosis, mood and depression as well as "Integrated Treatment Plan" from LSH showing a principal diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Paranoid Type and Antisocial Personality Disorder. Second, petitioner alleges that the Douglas County District Court erred in finding him guilty in Case No. 79 CR 24 after he was evaluated by "state doctors for the Douglas County Attorney Office... (and) found to be in need of psychiatric treatment." Mr. Hunter states that "in the past years" he has "filed several motions" in the trial court to no avail. He alleges that he is mentally ill and ignorant of court proceedings, and that the court took advantage and kept dismissing his cases for failure to state a claim.

Mr. Hunter also claims that "due to recurring psychosis" affected and "caused by long incarceration, " he was denied parole by the Kansas Parole Board.[5]

Petitioner asks the court to order his conviction reversed or to set an evidentiary hearing date to determine if there is reason for a retrial or modification of his sentence, to order his release from the Kansas Department of Corrections, and to vacate/modify his sentence. Petitioner also asks the court to review his "mental evaluation and medical reports" in his criminal case and at LSH, his prison health records, and his parole board records.

CHALLENGES TO 1982 CONVICTIONS

The court finds that the motion/petition filed by Mr. Hunter in this case attempting to challenge his 1982 state convictions is defective in that it is not upon court-approved forms, does not clearly state the grounds for relief, does not adequately set forth exhaustion of state court remedies as to each ground, and does not address the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.