Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Gantt

United States District Court, Tenth Circuit

January 28, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
DESHANE GANTT, Defendant.

ORDER

MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 67). Defendant is appealing from this court's memorandum and order filed November 22, 2013 denying defendant's pro se motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 63). It does not appear that defendant sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with his § 2255 motion but defendant was represented in the underlying criminal case by the public defender which indicates that he was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense by engaging retained counsel.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), the court certifies that defendant's appeal is not taken in good faith for the reasons stated in its memorandum and order (Doc. 63). For this reason, defendant's application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied.

Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(4)(A) and (B), the clerk is directed to notify the parties and the Tenth Circuit of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.