Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eastwood v. Beckham

United States District Court, Tenth Circuit

December 2, 2013

MARY EASTWOOD, Plaintiff,
v.
RONALD BECKHAM, et al., Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION

James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge

Order Pursuant to Canon 3 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, the parties and their attorneys of record are hereby informed of the potential disqualification of the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, from further acting in this case. Canon 3C(1) provides that a “judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Defendants Roanld Beckham are represented by K. Paul Day of Lathrop & Gage, L.C., a law firm which employs Judge O’Hara’s daughter, Kate O’Hara Gasper, as an associate. In accordance with the law firm’s internal conflict-of-interest screening procedures, Kate O’Hara Gasper is not working on this case.

The applicable ethical standards make clear that the above-described circumstances, standing alone, do not constitute a situation in which a judge’s impartiality could be reasonably questioned, and therefore judicial disqualification under Canon 3 is not required. See Advisory Opinion No. 58 (rev. July 10, 1998), Committee on Codes of Conduct, U.S. Judicial Conference. However, those standards also recognize that other circumstances could arise which, in combination with the relative’s status as an associate in a law firm involved in a case, might reasonably raise a question about the judge’s impartiality and in turn warrant disqualification. Judge O’Hara represents that is unaware of any disqualifying circumstances. But he acknowledges that one of the parties or lawyers involved in this case might have knowledge of such circumstances.

In an abundance of caution, and to ensure that all parties and counsel involved in this case are notified of circumstances that could be perceived as giving the appearance of impropriety, the court has issued this order. The parties and their counsel are hereby informed of this potential disqualification and ordered to comply with the directives set out in the contemporaneously issued Notice Concerning Waiver of Judicial Disqualification.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.