Monti L. Belot UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This case comes before the court on defendants’ motions to exclude evidence (Docs. 647, 648, 651, 687) and defendant Gonzalo Ramirez’s motions to exclude co-defendant statements and to produce additional discovery. (Docs. 690, 691). The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision. (Docs. 727, 728, 730, 733, 765, 771). The court held a hearing on this matter on September 12, 2013.
On April 16, 2012, the grand jury returned an indictment against 23 defendants. The indictment alleges 38 counts, including charges of violent crimes in aid of racketeering, conspiracy and felon in possession of a firearm. As of this date, 15 defendants have entered guilty pleas. Ramirez, Garcia and Vargas are set for trial on October 2. Adam Flores is set for trial on November 19. The remaining defendants are currently set for trial on December 3 although it is likely that the trial will be moved to January 2014.
Defendants are all charged in count 1 with conspiracy to commit racketeering activities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). The alleged RICO conspiracy occurred from 2008 through April 16, 2012.
The indictment alleges that defendants were engaged in a criminal organization, the Nortenos gang, whose members engaged in narcotics distribution and acts of violence including murder and robbery. These crimes were alleged to have been committed in Dodge City, Kansas.
Both Ramirez and Garcia are additionally charged in counts 2 through 9, which include VICAR conspiracies and VICAR substantive offenses. Ramirez is also charged in counts 10 through 13. Vargas is charged in counts 23, 24, 25 and 29.
A. Motions to Exclude (Docs. 647, 648, 651, 687)
The government has notified defendants that it intends to offer evidence of past criminal activity to establish the existence of an enterprise and as evidence of RICO predicate acts. Defendants object to the introduction of this evidence, citing Rules 401, 403 and 404(b). In United States v. Harris, 695 F.3d 1125 (10th Cir. 2012), the Tenth Circuit set forth the elements for a RICO conspiracy as follows:
First: A conspiracy or agreement, as detailed in the indictment, existed between two or more persons to participate in the affairs of an enterprise that affected interstate commerce through a pattern of racketeering activity;
Second: that defendant deliberately joined or became a member of the conspiracy or agreement with knowledge of its purpose[;] and[ ]
Third: the defendant agreed that someone, not necessarily the defendant, would commit at least two of the racketeering ...