Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dunn v. United States Postal Service

Decided: March 18, 1992.

ALAN R. DUNN, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RESPONDENT.



Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board, No. BN075288A0065.

Before Nies, Chief Judge, Rich and Michel, Circuit Judges.

Nies

NIES, Chief Judge.

Alan R. Dunn appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, No. BN075288A0065, denying his request for attorney fees. The administrative Judge had awarded Dunn his attorney fees under 5 U.S.C § 7701(g)(1) (1988) and in a split decision the full Board reversed. We reverse the Board.

ANALYSIS

In a previous appeal, this court mitigated the penalty of removal to a six-month suspension because of the agency's failure to consider all mitigating factors. Dunn v. United States Postal Service, No. 88-3285 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 1989). As a result of such failure, the agency, under clear and uniform case law, could not reasonably expect to prevail on the merits respecting the severity of the penalty. Allen v. United States Postal Service, 2 M.S.P.R. 420, 435 (1980) (the fifth Allen factor). Accordingly, as the government does not challenge the amount of the fees, Dunn is awarded his attorney fees in the amount of $4,375.33.

19920318

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.